01
Requirements changed
Doctrine, policy, technology, or clinical practice changed while the courseware remained static.
Institutional Training Continuity Governance™
Keep mission-critical training current, reviewable, and ready for use.
BBS helps federal military and healthcare training organizations modernize legacy courseware, restore documentation continuity, and prepare deliverables for review, acceptance, and sustainment.
TR 350-70-Aligned
Section 508 / QA Review
SCORM & xAPI Delivery
ATIS-Aware Documentation
The pressure point
Training change creates operational exposure.
Modernization is rarely just a content problem. It is a continuity problem—authority, ownership, currency, evidence, and acceptance must move together.
02
Continuity fractured
Turnover, missing source files, unclear ownership, or undocumented decisions disrupted progress.
03
Acceptance stalled
Review findings, traceability gaps, accessibility issues, or unclear criteria delayed release.
Three connected systems
From knowledge to performance.
BBS provides defined work packages that diagnose the risk, modernize the training product, and establish the evidence required for continued sustainment.
SYSTEM ONE
Documentation & Knowledge Governance
Knowledge capture, SOP development, authoritative-source mapping, ownership, version control, and transition-ready handoffs.
SYSTEM TWO
Training & Workforce Readiness
TR 350-70-aligned courseware, Storyline/Rise, assessments, SCORM/xAPI packaging, and accessibility-aware development.
SYSTEM THREE
Program Delivery Support
Backlogs, review gates, acceptance criteria, QA/QC logs, issue disposition, stakeholder cadence, and release documentation.
The entry offer
Training Continuity & Acceptance Readiness Sprint
A time-boxed assessment that determines what exists, what changed, what is missing, what threatens acceptance, and what should move first.
Low-risk start: Begin with one course, lesson set, documentation package, or defined process—without committing to a full rebuild.
- 01Inventory and baseline
Identify authoritative files, versions, owners, dependencies, and known gaps. - 02Currency and impact review
Trace requirement changes to affected learning and documentation assets. - 03Acceptance-risk register
Organize defects, accessibility considerations, evidence gaps, and decisions. - 04Prioritized action package
Deliver the backlog, acceptance criteria, governance plan, and next-work scope.
Intake-to-TOMA™
Governed delivery at every gate.
Every phase produces a reviewable artifact. SMEs validate content; designated authorities retain approval; BBS maintains the evidence trail.
Scope & inventory
Establish the baseline, constraints, governance, acceptance criteria, and prioritized backlog.
Build & validate
Develop in reviewable increments with structured SME validation, QA/QC, and issue disposition.
Package & sustain
Deliver source files, release notes, traceability, deployment documentation, and the next update cycle.
Relevant experience
Built in governance-heavy environments.
BBS applies principal experience across military, federal, healthcare, instructional design, quality assurance, and documentation operations.
Representative result
Five Army University lesson plans remediated to compliant status in approximately two weeks.
Work included structured review, compliance-focused remediation, coordination, and documented quality controls.
Breadth
15 training programs
Principal experience supporting modernization, instructional design, QA, and program delivery.
Operating model
Principal-delivered
Senior judgment remains close to the work, supported by specialized partners when scope requires.
Experience statements reflect the principal’s professional history and BBS work, as applicable. Details are provided when disclosure is authorized.
The Four Seats Perspective™
One training mission. Four essential viewpoints.
BBS evaluates whether training can be learned, taught, reviewed, accepted, delivered, and sustained—not merely whether the slides look finished.
Student
Is the training understandable, accessible, and usable?
Instructor
Can the material be taught consistently and confidently?
Contractor
Can the deliverable survive scope, review, QA, and acceptance controls?
CEO
Can the solution be delivered responsibly and sustained?
Start with the change
What changed—and which training products are now at risk?
Use a focused conversation to identify the affected courseware, documentation, review gates, and best next work package.
Start a Conversation