Define the change.
Set one bounded scope, identify the change event, establish authoritative requirements, and name the stakeholders who hold essential context.
The BBS approach
Knowledge becomes durable when governance is designed into the work.
BKCOS™ moves critical knowledge from exposure to controlled, validated, acceptance-ready use.
Make risk visible.
Review training, documentation, workflows, ownership, handoffs, and tacit knowledge for evidence of continuity exposure.
Assign authority.
Classify findings, establish ownership, resolve conflicts, and define how assets will be controlled and reviewed.
Test readiness.
Apply applicable standards, QA criteria, TA-DA™, and TCS™ condition states to determine what is defensible and what requires action.
Direct the work.
Deliver a prioritized roadmap, an executive decision brief, and an implementation path tied to the actual findings.
Training-specific diagnostic engine
TA-DA™ identifies training architecture debt.
When training is in scope, the Training Architecture Debt Assessment™ examines whether learning assets, source requirements, delivery systems, governance, and performance expectations remain aligned.
TCS™ expresses domain conditions along the established Fragile → Mission Ready continuum. It does not substitute opinion for evidence.
FragileExposedControlledGovernedMission Ready
The 36-Month Clock™
Continuity confidence declines when change accumulates without governance.
Every rotation, policy update, platform migration, contract transition, and leadership change introduces distance between what the organization knows and what its controlled assets preserve.
The clock is not a prediction that failure occurs at month 36. It is a decision aid: elapsed time and accumulated change should increase the urgency of review.
KnownUnverified